David Lindsay :: Weblog :: Web information is not 100% reliable- and that's a good thing.

August 23, 2008

Another 6th grade teacher, Scott Ritter, and I were talking the other day about how researching using the internet demands a scholarly, critical approach. We often talk about how you can't rely on the internet for information, but the fact of the matter is, you can't expect TV and Newspaper media to be wholly unbiased either. That said, people approach (and if they don't, they should) web resources with a healthy bit of skepticism. You have to evaluate the merit of the websites you go to, check resources, and triangulate with more resources. But most don't treat their LA Times with the same degree of skepticism, and that is a mistake.

Another criticism of web based material is that it is often written by independent, non-affiliated writers. Obviously that could be bad, but it also means that because anyone can publish freely, you can be sure that there are more writers online that aren't "bought" by their investors. I rather like the fact that I can find independent journalists that do not suffer from the conflict of interest that other journalists often do. Scott also brought up that many web-based journalists specialize in one area; he's seen them avidly covering sporting events. Their blog entries are based on their first-hand observations not just what an "eyewitness" (who chooses to remain anonymous) said.

I think of internet media as a cluster of data; the truth lay somewhere in the middle of that cluster. By sampling more points, your chance of finding that middle goes up. By reading news or getting information from only one source (like a textbook), you have a greater possibility of getting information that is on the fringe.

My wife bought a book recently called: History Lessons. It shows what other countries' textbooks have to say about history. The difference between accounts is astounding. People don't think to question the validity of their history text, but... there it is.

Anyhow, I found this article on Edutopia on much the same thing today. It goes further and talks about how you can set up research tasks for your students to collect information from the web in a systematically-approached, critically-judged way. I can't think of a better skill for our future participants of democracy to have.

Keywords: bias, history, internet, lindsay, news, research

Posted by David Lindsay | Share This


Comments

  1. I couldn't agree more, although I think a better understanding of search engines is also in order. The natural tendency is to assume that the top results in a search are the most accurate, when in fact they are often the least, as they are subject to built-in biases in the search engine and "gaming" of the system. Learning to leverage the capabilities of the search engine to narrow results by sub-domain, search for content that links back to the initial target, discover the owner of a domain, and explore international perspectives are vital skills for both teachers and students in the 21st century.

    Jim Klein on Monday, 1 September 2008, 19:02 PDT

  2. We're actually tackling this issue right now in class. I agree that search engines can be used more effectively to help minimize the hits you don't want. When I posted my original thoughts, I was mainly thinking about how the possibility for bad info on the web actually can be viewed as a positive because it helps instill the type of skepticism that is required by those who use logic to guide their decision-making process. Like Spock.

    David Lindsay on Monday, 1 September 2008, 21:37 PDT

Add a comment

Your comment text

Your name

Comment visibility:

Please enter the code in the image below

Security Code